The Knowledge Management (KM) Officer is a conductor of an organization’s collective intelligence. Their principal role includes ensuring that intellectual capital is effectively stored and organized so it flows freely to members when needed.

However, issues arise when people hoard information out of fear of becoming less valuable to the company. Some also feel that sharing is a role secondary only to their main responsibilities. This leads to departments operating in silos, resulting in delayed decision-making and slow progress. How do KM leaders start a culture of contribution that’s instinctive and visible?

The Case for a Contribution-Driven Knowledge Culture

A culture of contribution is rooted in shared value. It builds an organization’s collective intelligence and reduces errors when expertise gets passed around and doesn’t leave with individuals should they exit. It also gives the participating person a sense of purpose when they see their work making a difference, either as an excellent model worth emulating or a success that advances outcomes.

The opposite culture, where knowledge is hoarded or guarded in fear of losing power, creates operational drag. Studies show that people often keep information to themselves because of both workplace conditions and personal attitudes. This occurs when there’s excessive competition, time pressure or office politics or when leaders prioritize their own interests. On an individual level, employees may withhold data if they feel insecure, lack trust in others or believe sharing could harm their position.

Data has become the world’s most valuable asset and possessing vital information can make individuals feel important and irreplaceable — much like when only one person can perform a complex task that others have been unable to complete because of their unique knowledge.

As a result, teams are forced to start from scratch when information should have been accessible from the outset. Critical knowledge held by top performers who keep it to themselves often disappears during turnover, leading to duplicated efforts and limiting opportunities for improvement drawn from prior experiences. If this organizational atmosphere sounds familiar, the company may be ready for a cultural shift, especially since 75% of workers view collaboration as vital to their work.

Leadership as the Kickstarter of Contribution

Higher-ups cannot expect members to act when armed only with a framework but without a visible model to learn from. They must be the first to actively promote the cultural shift to send a strong signal that contribution is the standard, expected and ingrained in company culture.

Only one in three leaders can confidently say that their last initiative achieved the level of adoption they aimed for. However, the more bosses talk about changing culture without showing it in action, the more performative it feels to those they lead. Hence, they must talk the talk and walk the walk.

Practical leadership behaviors include strong communication initiatives such as:

●  Structured knowledge-sharing rituals such as weekly insight exchanges or retrospectives. These provide rhythm and reliability to collaboration.

●  Reflection sessions, where teams record what succeeded and what did not, ensure that experiential development becomes institutional learning.

●  Leading with vulnerability, where executives discuss their own challenges and learning curves. This normalizes openness and gradually eliminates the fear of being wrong.

These practices reposition KM from a guide on the side to an actual leadership initiative that produces measurable results, rather than an administrative vision that lacks concrete application.

Knowledge management should be gradually woven into daily routines, rather than expecting members to adapt immediately. Culture change initiatives typically take anywhere from 18 to 36 months to gain traction, depending on the scope and depth of transformation being pursued.

How to Design Systems That Enable Contribution

Behavioral change requires an environment that removes friction from sharing. When information exchange is cumbersome or poorly recognized, participation declines regardless of intent. A KM officer’s decisions, such as those on platforms, workflows and governance, can directly influence contribution quality and frequency.

1. Establish Collaborative Infrastructure

Create a digital environment that serves as the organization’s digital memory, utilizing tools such as intranets, shared drives or knowledge hubs. This allows the KM officer to avoid manually entering every piece of information into the network, as the team already has a virtual front door where members can access up-to-date policies and resources.

2. Organize Knowledge for Easy Access

Information overload can weaken the value of knowledge management, especially when files are dumped in a single folder or drive. Team members produce output daily, which can easily become overwhelming. Here’s what KM managers can do to keep everything labeled and sorted:

●  Keep shared information structured and searchable.

●  Tag and categorize files so employees can quickly find what they need without wasting time sorting through clutter.

●  Regularly review and update content to ensure accuracy and relevance.

3. Integrate Knowledge-Sharing Into Workflows

Adding knowledge-sharing prompts to tools like project management or CRM systems encourages real-time exchange, allowing insights to pour naturally as work happens. Make output uploads a standard part of the workflow and establish clear, straightforward protocols for doing so. This supports smoother adoption and consistent participation.

Reinforcing Contribution Through Recognition

Recognition remains one of the most effective drivers of sustained participation. Employees who see their input acknowledged through awards, visible mentions or integration of their ideas develop a sense of ownership in organizational outcomes. It’s also important that praise highlights impact rather than volume. Focus on how shared insights improved a process, reduced costs or supported decision-making.

Continuous development also reinforces contribution. Providing micro-learning modules, peer sessions or mentorship channels signals that expertise exchange is expected and supported. When skill-building opportunities are tied to knowledge-sharing behaviors, employees perceive direct personal benefit in participating.

Build and Enduring Knowledge System

A culture of contribution thrives when leadership models openness, systems make sharing effortless and recognition reinforces participation. For KM officers, the real measure of success lies in how well knowledge flows across people and processes, turning individual expertise into collective intelligence that strengthens the organization’s endeavors.

_________________________________

When an employee exits or retires, they take with them years of client insights, relationship nuances, and lessons learned the hard way. While formal handovers usually cover project details, the subtle but critical elements — like client preferences, unwritten rules, or effective communication styles — are often left behind. The result? The new hire spends weeks, sometimes months, rediscovering what someone else already knew.
‍

This is where Knowledge Management (KM) plays a pivotal role. Onboarding and offboarding should not be treated as separate checklists but as two halves of the same cycle — a continuous flow of knowledge where every exit fuels the next entry.

Offboarding: Capturing Tacit Knowledge

A structured offboarding process goes beyond handing over documents. It includes:

• Exit Knowledge Interviews: Capturing what worked, what didn’t, and the “if I had known earlier” moments.
  
• Client Preference Sheets: Insights on tone, style, and relationship nuances.
  
• Tacit Capture Formats: Quick video walkthroughs, shadowing sessions, or personal notes.
  This ensures that knowledge is not lost but packaged for reuse.
  

Onboarding: Enabling Faster Ramp-Up

For the new employee, onboarding should mean more than reading policies. They need context, connections, and clarity. This can be enabled through:

• Role-Specific Knowledge Packs with client history, deliverables, and FAQs.
  
• Buddy/SME Connects to clarify unspoken rules.
  
• Knowledge Walkthroughs of captured insights and recordings.
  This approach accelerates productivity and reduces training overhead.
  

The Shared Interface: A KM Hub

A central repository — whether on SharePoint, Confluence, or a KM portal — should host all transition knowledge in a standardized, easy-to-search format. Paired with templates like handover checklists and preference sheets, it becomes the single source of truth for smooth transitions.

Closing the Loop

What makes this cycle sustainable is a feedback loop: new employees update the pack after their first 90 days, ensuring that knowledge remains current and relevant. Managers and KM teams can track adoption and measure success through reduced onboarding time, fewer repeated errors, and smoother client continuity.Onboarding and offboarding are not one-off events. They form a continuous KM lifecycle. When integrated well, this cycle transforms employee transitions from a reset button into a relay baton — ensuring that knowledge never leaves the organization but keeps moving forward.

__________________________

"I keep hearing AI is going to take over everything — even Knowledge Management. Should we be worried?”

The fact of the matter is not at all. AI isn’t here to replace us; it’s here to make us more effective. Think of it as an extra hand that helps us do KM smarter, faster, and with greater impact.”

‍

‍

Why This Matters

“But we already have repositories and portals. Isn’t that enough?”

“That’s exactly the point. Repositories are useful, but they’re not enough. Storing knowledge and creating Communities doesn’t guarantee their usage, as most KM teams struggle with KM adoption.

What really drives KM success is collaboration, networks, and processes that keep people at the center. When people can easily connect with knowledge and each other, that’s when an ecosystem comes alive. And AI is the catalyst that makes this possible.”

The KM Shift

“So how does AI change the KM landscape?”

“Here’s how AI supports it in practice:

• Repositories → Ecosystems
  Instead of static storage, AI links documents, discussions, and experts.
  Use Case: AI recommends SMEs when you search for a topic, not just files.
  
• Curation → Insight Delivery
  KM isn’t about uploading PDFs anymore; it’s about surfacing what matters.
  Use Case: AI highlights the 3 most relevant insights from a 40-page report — helping teams act, not just read.
  
• Search → Conversational Discovery
  People don’t want to “search”; they want answers.
  Use Case: A sales team asks in natural language, “Show me winning proposals in the healthcare sector,” — and AI pulls the snippets instantly.
  
• Adoption Driver → Experience Enabler
  Adoption campaigns often fail because portals feel disconnected. AI brings knowledge into the workflow.
  Use Case: An AI agent in Teams automatically shares relevant playbooks during client call preparation, eliminating the need for extra searching.

With AI, knowledge doesn’t just sit in a portal; it comes alive through people, networks, and workflows.”

5 Ways AI Lends a Hand in KM

Here are five big ones:

1 –  Content Intelligence – Auto-tagging, duplicate detection, and gap analysis.
2 – Knowledge Discovery – Conversational search that feels like asking a colleague.
3 – Personalization – Role-based feeds and recommendations.
4 – Tacit Knowledge Capture – Summaries and insights from meetings and calls.
5 – Proactive Delivery – Knowledge appearing in Teams, Slack, or CRM when you need it.

Steps for KM Leaders: to Start Leveraging AI

Keep it simple and build momentum:

1. Start small — pilot one AI use case (like auto-tagging).
   
2. Co-create with SMEs and users to build trust.
   
3. Embed AI into daily workflows — not another portal.
   
4. Measure & showcase quick wins (time saved, reuse rates).
   
5. Scale gradually across teams, functions, and regions.
   

AI won’t replace Knowledge Managers. It makes us more strategic. We move from managing repositories to curating experiences. From being content custodians to becoming AI-enabled change leaders.

AI doesn’t replace KM discipline. It helps us finally deliver on the promise of KM: knowledge that is living, connected, and impactful.

___________________

Some time ago, I wrote about knowledge mapping — the process of visually representing intellectual assets, knowledge flows, and internal relationships within an organization or domain. It remains a foundational tool in any successful KM strategy, helping to surface hidden knowledge, connect people to what (and who) they need, and build smarter workflows.

‍

But today, I want to take a more practical turn — to share how I’m using knowledge mapping as part of our KM practice. It’s no longer just a static exercise of mapping who-knows-what. It’s now something that helps people find people, uncover knowledge that matters, and drive daily adoption of KM systems. Here’s how.
‍
Making Knowledge Maps Work for People — Not Just Portals

At its core, knowledge mapping helps answer three key questions:

1. What knowledge exists?
2. Where does it live (people, tools, processes)?
3. Where are the gaps?

In my current role, I’ve used knowledge mapping not just as an internal audit, but as a connectivity exercise — mapping people to knowledge, not just documents to folders. For example, when onboarding new team members across regions, I rely on maps to quickly show who holds key experience, where to find pitch content, or what reusable assets exist for a particular offering or vertical.

This has helped shorten the onboarding curve by over 30%, simply because people aren’t starting from scratch or searching in silos.

Mapping Tacit Knowledge: A Quiet Game-Changer

One of the biggest wins from knowledge mapping is surfacing tacit knowledge — the kind that sits in people’s heads, in email trails, or shared casually on calls. By identifying knowledge flows, experts, and communities of practice, I’ve been able to facilitate intentional knowledge transfer:

• Setting up micro-mentoring loops between SMEs and juniors
• Creating expert directories aligned with themes and geographies
• Highlighting hidden champions during proposal work

This kind of mapping has driven collaboration beyond roles and regions, sparking discussions that wouldn’t have happened otherwise.

Often, KM tools and repositories struggle with engagement. People don’t use what they can’t find or don’t know exists.

That’s where knowledge maps come in — designed with intent and empathy. Not just org-wide maps, but role-based, task-driven maps:

• What does a new bid manager need to know in week 1?
• What reusable content exists for X solution in Y region?
• Who handled similar RFPs in the last 6 months?

By integrating these maps into everyday workflows (think SharePoint pages, Teams channels, proposal SOPs), I’ve seen a notable increase in adoption, because knowledge becomes visible, navigable, and usable.

Turning Maps into Growth and Innovation Tools

Beyond just surfacing gaps or knowledge hoarders, I’ve used maps to work with delivery and solutioning teams to:

• Highlight skills dependencies and build learning roadmaps
• Plan succession and risk mitigation when key people move out
• Reduce rework by surfacing redundant content or outdated flows
• Spot cross-sell opportunities where similar knowledge was underleveraged

It’s KM at its best — not reactive, but proactive, and always people-first.

Final Thoughts

Knowledge mapping is not a one-time exercise. Done right, it becomes an ongoing compass for people, processes, and performance.

As a Knowledge Manager, I’ve seen firsthand how it boosts clarity, sparks collaboration, and strengthens adoption. Whether you’re building KM from scratch or evolving a mature framework, my advice is simple: make your maps meaningful. Keep them live, people-centered, and integrated into the way your teams actually work.

Because at the end of the day, knowledge mapping isn’t about maps — it’s about movement of knowledge, experience, insights, wisdom, skills and Ideas.

‍

‍

In today’s data-rich organizations, intellectual capital is more than just an asset — it is a strategic advantage. Safeguarding that intelligence requires more than technology or policy. It demands dedicated professionals who can ensure the quality, accessibility and ethical use of organizational knowledge.

‍

Knowledge stewards play this essential role. These individuals act as custodians of institutional memory, facilitating the flow of accurate, secure and usable information across departments, systems and teams.

Defining the Knowledge Steward Role

Knowledge stewards are responsible for overseeing the life cycle and governance of an organization’s intellectual assets. They craft and enforce policies that guide how information is created, stored, classified, accessed and shared. This includes developing data governance frameworks that standardize terminology, taxonomies, access protocols and metadata usage.

These stewards also play a hands-on role in curating knowledge repositories, ensuring content is up to date, well-organized and easily searchable. In environments where knowledge is the backbone of decision-making, these professionals become the link between data governance and day-to-day operations.

Promoting knowledge sharing is another core component of the knowledge steward’s role. Through communities of practice, internal forums, mentoring networks and storytelling initiatives, stewards help institutionalize knowledge in ways that outlive individual roles or team configurations.

Core Responsibilities in Practice

While the role of a knowledge steward may vary by industry or organizational size, their responsibilities typically fall into these key areas that support the integrity, accessibility and security of organizational knowledge.

Data Governance and Quality Control

Knowledge stewards lead efforts to standardize and manage data quality across the organization. They define protocols for data accuracy, completeness and consistency while maintaining metadata schemas.Through version control and routine audits, they ensure knowledge assets remain current, reliable and aligned with enterprise goals.

Repository Curation and Content Structuring

Knowledge stewards manage the organization’s knowledge repositories by organizing, tagging and categorizing content using consistent taxonomies and metadata models. In addition to maintaining digital libraries, stewards help capture tacit knowledge — such as insights from interviews or internal processes — and convert it into structured, reusable formats.

Policy Development and Compliance Enforcement

Knowledge stewards develop, implement and enforce policies governing how information is created, accessed, shared, retained and retired. These policies ensure compliance with legal and internal standards. Stewards also train employees and drive adoption across departments to embed knowledge stewardship practices into daily operations.

Stakeholder Engagement and Knowledge Sharing

Stewards coordinate with team leads, subject matter experts and cross-functional teams to foster collaboration and breakdown silos. Since knowledge management teams are often small, organizations rely on knowledge champions within departments to spread best practices.Knowledge stewards support them with clear guidelines, tools and governance frameworks that make knowledge-sharing part of everyday work.

Information Security and Risk Mitigation

Knowledge stewards play a key role in protecting sensitive organizational knowledge by working with cybersecurity teams to develop policies that reduce data exposure. While cyber liability insurance can cover losses after a breach, stewards focus on prevention — building governance structures that limit risks before they escalate. With smart contract flaws behind four of the top seven cyberattacks in early 2024, their role in securing complex systems through clear documentation, visibility and accountability is more critical than ever.

Governance Frameworks and Life Cycle Oversight

Finally, knowledge stewards build and uphold governance frameworks that define roles, responsibilities and processes related to knowledge flow. They resolve content ownership conflicts and establish guidelines supporting the long-term sustainability of knowledge systems.

Skills and Competencies for Effective Knowledge Stewardship

Robust knowledge management requires a core team skilled in business processes, technology and content curation. Within this team, knowledge stewards play abridging role, combining technical, analytical and interpersonal skills to connect strategy with execution.

Their expertise in information management allows them to design, manage and optimize content structures such as metadata models. Familiarity with knowledge management platforms — such as SharePoint, Confluence or enterprise data catalogs — enables them to support both the front-end user experience and the back-end infrastructure.

They must also be proficient in policy development and enforcement. This requires translating organizational strategy and compliance requirements into actionable standards and procedures. Strong communication and instructional skills are essential, as knowledge stewards often lead training sessions, write documentation and run awareness campaigns to promote policy adherence.

Collaboration is another key competency.Knowledge stewards frequently work across departments to align knowledge practices with organizational goals. Their ability to mediate between technical teams, leadership and frontline staff enables them to build consensus and drive adoption of knowledge initiatives.

Equally important is their understanding of security and privacy regulations. Knowledge stewards must know how to classify and protect sensitive content, ensuring alignment with frameworks such as theNational Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) or the Federal Risk andAuthorization Management Program (FedRAMP), depending on the organization’s sector and obligations.

Building a Knowledge-Driven Culture

The presence of effective knowledge stewards helps establish and sustain a culture where knowledge is viewed as a shared resource rather than a departmental asset. They enable continuous learning by embedding knowledge exchange into the organization’s operations. By facilitating storytelling initiatives, peer mentoring and communities of practice, knowledge stewards support the transfer of both formal and experiential learning.

They also embed knowledge into daily workflows by organizing content in an intuitive, accessible way.
This integration reduces the time employees spend searching for information and increases the speed and accuracy of decision-making. Additionally, knowledge stewards build trust across teams, departments and leadership levels by fostering transparency in knowledge sharing and management.

Another critical contribution lies in strategic alignment. These stewards ensure knowledge practices are both operationally sound and aligned with long-term business objectives. This alignment helps drive innovation, improve customer service and support organizational agility.

Knowledge Stewards as Strategic Enablers

Knowledge stewards are more than information managers — they are strategic enablers who turn data into actionable insight. By curating content, enforcing governance and promoting secure knowledge sharing, they help protect and activate an organization’s collective intelligence.

__________________